No. |
Places |
Description |
Coverage |
Links |
.pdf |
.tdr |
Names | Notes |
Sources |
Last update on |
| 1001 | Deleted |
Now Tree19 (Linked Trees section) | ||||||||
| 1002 | Enfield and Middlesborough | Descendants of John Pluck and Lucy Chambless (134 people) | c1790 - today | none |
10 Apr 2015 | |||||
| 1003 | Deleted | Now Tree18 ( Linked Trees section) | ||||||||
| 1004 | Deleted | Now Tree17 (Linked Trees section) | ||||||||
| 1005 | Jersey | Descendants of Michael and Ann Pluck (38 people) | c1740 - 1900 | none |
6 Jan 2008 | |||||
| 1006 | East London and elsewhere | Descendants of John Pluckrose and Hannah Rounding (303 people) | c1770 - today | Tree1010 |
12 Jun 2014 | |||||
| 1007 | Harlow, East London and elsewhere | Descendants of Daniel Pluckrose and Mary (257 people) | c1740 - today | Tree1015 |
26 Apr 2015 | |||||
| 1008 | Wanstead and Marylebone | Descendants of George Pluckrose and Sarah Tolson (113 people) | c1730 - today | none |
5 May 2013 | |||||
| 1009 | Wicklow, Ireland, and Birkenhead | Descendants of Timothy Pluck and Mary Toole (87 people) | c1770 - today | none |
2 Nov 2010 | |||||
| 1010 | East London, Scotland & Australia | Descendants of John Pluckrose and Rosamond Gibson (180 people) | c1700 - today | Trees 1006 & 1012 |
2 June 2016 | |||||
| 1011 | Gilston | Descendants of John Pluckrose and Collet Lynsell (48 people) | c1600 - 1770 | none |
20 Dec 2007 | |||||
| 1012 | Woodford, East London and elsewhere | Descendants of Daniel Pluckrose and Sarah Musgrove (260 people) | c1780 - today | Tree1010 |
29 Jun 2016 | |||||
| 1013 | Wicklow and Winsconsin | Descendants of Hugh Pluck and Mary Doyle (52 people) | c1775 - today | none |
20 Sep 2010 | |||||
| 1014 | Ireland and Liverpool | Descendants of Patrick Pluck and Catherine MacClean (101 people) | c1775 - today | none |
29 Dec 2013 | |||||
| 1015 | Harlow and East London | Descendants of Ann Pluckrose (66 people) | c1825 - today | Tree1007 |
11 Jul 2016 |
| Caution: These trees are under active development. I do not believe that I have made any unreasonable assumptions in their compilation but the standard of proof is probably a little less than in the "Linked" or "Loose" trees. Any errors are in the detail rather than in the big picture. Read the associated notes and sources files for further information. Any contributions to the verification and expansion of these trees will be very welcome. |
